Validations of satellite ozone profiles in austral spring using ozonesonde measurements in the Jang Bogo station, Antarctica
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이하나 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Taejin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Seong-Joong | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박주선 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 안다현 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Natalya Kramarova | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박상서 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김준 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 구자호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-18T16:36:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-18T16:36:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.kopri.re.kr/handle/201206/14078 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Using ozonesonde measurements from 2015 to 2018 at the Jang Bogo station located in the southeastern Ant arctic region, we evaluate ozone profiles retrieved from the three satellite measurements that are widely used: Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), and Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite (OMPS) data. For the fair validation, ozonesonde profiles are smoothed using the weighting function of each satellite retrieval algorithm (i.e., convolution process). Compared with limb-viewing MLS and OMPS ozone profiles, the OMI ozone profiles are relatively less qualified: coarser vertical resolution and larger inter-annual variation. Nevertheless, our validation reveals that the quality of all three satellite ozone profiles looks com parable; In general, difference from ozonesonde profile is ~1 ppm absolutely, and ? 20 to 30% relatively at maximum. This quantitative range well corresponds to previous work, meaning that our new validation confirms the reliability of satellite ozone profiles in the southeastern Antarctic region where the measurement data for the validation were not enough. Another interesting feature is the role of a priori ozone profile; Nadir-viewing OMI satellite can have qualified ozone profiles by a proper assumption of a priori ozone profile. Since the performance of limb-viewing ozone profiles is better, however, the careful usage of nadir-viewing ozone profile is still required. We think that the simultaneous usage of multiple satellite ozone profiles can contribute to better understanding of Antarctic ozone characteristics. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.subject.classification | Jang Bogo Station | - |
dc.title | Validations of satellite ozone profiles in austral spring using ozonesonde measurements in the Jang Bogo station, Antarctica | - |
dc.title.alternative | 남극 장보고기지 오존존데 측정치를 이용한 인공위성 오존 프로파일 검증 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 이하나, et al. 2022. "Validations of satellite ozone profiles in austral spring using ozonesonde measurements in the Jang Bogo station, Antarctica". <em>ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH</em>, 214(1): 1-10. | - |
dc.citation.title | ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.volume | 214 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114087 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 10 | - |
dc.description.articleClassification | SCIE | - |
dc.description.jcrRate | JCR 2020:7.882 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | 오존 위성 관측 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | 오존 현장 관측 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | 장보고기지 | - |
dc.identifier.localId | 2022-0151 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.