Revealing the seasonal cycles of Arctic phytoplankton: insights from year-round chlorophyll monitoring
Cited 0 time in
Cited 0 time in
-
Title
-
Revealing the seasonal cycles of Arctic phytoplankton: insights from year-round chlorophyll monitoring
-
Other Titles
-
북극 식물플랑크톤의 계절 주기: 연중 엽록소 농도 모니터링에서 얻은 통찰
-
Authors
-
Ko, Eunho
Park, Jisoo
Cho, Kyoung-Ho
Yoo, Jaeill
Moon, Jung Kuk
Yang, Eun Jin
Yang Eun Jin
-
Keywords
-
Arctic Ocean; Korean Arctic Mooring System; chlorophyll; phytoplankton seasonality; under-ice blooms
-
Issue Date
-
2024-01
-
Citation
-
Ko, Eunho, et al. 2024. "Revealing the seasonal cycles of Arctic phytoplankton: insights from year-round chlorophyll monitoring". ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 19(2): 0-0.
-
Abstract
-
Rapid Arctic Ocean warming has caused severe sea ice decline, impacting light distribution, phytoplankton blooms, and primary production. We investigated Arctic phytoplankton bloom timing using continuous chlorophyll-a fluorescence data obtained from three Korea Arctic Mooring Systems (KAMSs) deployed north of the East Siberian Sea (KAMS1), north of the Chukchi Sea (KAMS2), and the middle of the Northwind Ridge (KAMS4). Our findings revealed that the bloom initiation times were June 4 (+/- 28 d) in KAMS1, June 24 in KAMS2, and May 21 (+/- 6 d) in KAMS4, when the sea ice concentration (SIC) was >90% and the ice thickness was 1-2 m, indicating that the under-ice phytoplankton blooms (UIBs) developed 1-2 months before the sea ice retreated (mid-July, when SIC was <80%). Peak bloom and termination times were consistently observed in early August and mid-October, respectively. The average phytoplankton bloom lasted for approximately four months, longer than the open water periods at the mooring sites. However, the timing of the phytoplankton blooms from the biogeochemical model-based reconstructions was, on average, 6-10 weeks later than that deduced from the observed data. Furthermore, the maximum chlorophyll-a concentration observed during the bloom peak was approximately ten-times higher than that indicated by the biogeochemical model-based reconstructions (1.81 vs. 0.17 mg (-3)). The differences in chlorophyll-a concentrations and bloom timings indicate that biogeochemical models remain insufficient for simulating the phytoplankton dynamics of the Arctic Ocean, such as UIBs and the subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer. Based on the continuously observed chlorophyll-a concentrations, we gained a precise understanding of the seasonal cycles of Arctic phytoplankton, including UIBs. These valuable data will contribute to improving the accuracy of biogeochemical models of the Arctic Ocean.
-
URI
-
https://repository.kopri.re.kr/handle/201206/16214
-
DOI
-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad1e7e
-
Type
-
Article
-
Station
-
Araon
-
Indexed
-
SCIE
- Appears in Collections
- 2024-2024, 북극해 온난화-해양생태계 변화 감시 및 미래전망 연구 (24-24) / 양은진 (PM24040)
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.